Netanyahu’s US Visit: Power, Weapons, and Money Over Human Lives

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent address to the US Congress has raised significant concerns and showcased a troubling reality: sometimes, power, weapons, and money take precedence over human lives. His speech, which came amid the ongoing war in Gaza and increasing international scrutiny, highlights the complex and often morally questionable dynamics of international politics.

Netanyahu's visit came at a time of immense political turmoil in both the United States and Israel. The war in Gaza has entered its tenth month, with Hamas still holding 120 hostages, half of whom are believed to be alive. The International Court of Justice is hearing a genocide case against Israel, and the International Criminal Court has accused Israeli leaders, including Netanyahu, of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Despite these serious allegations, Netanyahu received a platform to speak to US lawmakers, underscoring how political and military alliances can overshadow humanitarian concerns.

Support for Israel in the United States has notably declined. Gallup polls indicate a drop in favourability from 68% to 58% overall, with a dramatic fall among Democratic voters and young adults. Yet, Netanyahu's speech was an attempt to bolster US support, particularly among Republicans who have traditionally been more supportive of Israel. His rhetoric painted Israel as a crucial ally against Iran, emphasizing shared enemies and common threats to justify continued US military aid.

Netanyahu's speech did little to bridge the growing divide among American lawmakers and the public. Approximately 40 Democrats boycotted the address, reflecting their discontent with Netanyahu's policies and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Protests erupted both inside and outside the Capitol, with demonstrators decrying the extensive civilian casualties in Gaza and Israel's military tactics.

While American Jews have historically supported Israel, this solidarity has shown cracks, particularly with the rise of Netanyahu's "full, full right-wing" government. The appointment of controversial figures like Itamar Ben Gvir and the ongoing war have deepened these fissures. Although there was significant Jewish support for Israel at the war's outset, the prolonged conflict and humanitarian toll have led to increased criticism and calls for a more balanced approach.

Netanyahu had the chance to reset US-Israel relations and address the concerns of both Democrats and American Jews. However, his speech largely reiterated his government's hardline policies. He committed to prosecuting the war against Hamas to "total victory," maintained open-ended security control over Gaza, and made no substantial moves toward a diplomatic process with the Palestinians. This stance undermines potential regional alliances and fails to address the broader calls for peace and human rights.

Netanyahu's visit and speech exemplify how political leaders often prioritize power, weapons, and financial support over human lives. By focusing on military alliances and shared threats, Netanyahu sidestepped the pressing humanitarian issues and the need for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict. This approach not only exacerbates the suffering of civilians but also fuels further division and instability.

Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit to the US, while strategically significant, highlights a disturbing reality in international politics. The prioritization of power, weapons, and money over human lives is a stark reminder of the moral compromises often made by political leaders. As the conflict in Gaza continues and international scrutiny intensifies, policymakers must re-evaluate their approaches and prioritize humanitarian concerns alongside strategic interests. The path to lasting peace and stability lies in addressing these fundamental issues, not in perpetuating cycles of violence and division.